The contest between live and synthetic sounds.
This blog may be
read as an introduction to the 10 pieces of popular music which feature
contemporary techniques. Its focus is
mainly on serious contemporary composers who pioneered many of the uses of
sound manipulation adopted by recording engineers from the mid 1960’s onwards.
There is a
continual process of leapfrogging played between developments in instrumental
and electronic sounds, before the 1950’s the orchestra had enriched its palette
of sounds through the introduction of exotic instruments, particularly
percussion. Composers like Varese
extended the range further, no one will forget the first time they experience
the lion’s roar in “Ionisation” or his use of sirens. Today we can incorporate any natural sound
into the theatre or concert hall to enrich a performance, Tchaikovsky’s 1812
has benefitted from sampled cannon sounds. The use of electronic instruments as
in MIDI harpsichords or harps creates more controversy at this time and would
be regarded as “poor form” by some musicians and audiences.
It can be
delightful to play chicken and the egg games with the whole issue of orchestral
textures emulating electronically generated sounds and naturally produced
sonorities aping synthesized sounds in the concert hall. Rather than list works that show these trends this
blog intends to show why some of the developments came about and provide some
examples which may stimulate thinking about “new” textures and their place in
our toolbox of composing resources.
Why did we expand the sound palette to include
machine sounds and “noise”?
From the period of
the First World War artists were abandoning 19th century values
turning instead to the development of technology and industry rather than
nature for their inspiration. If we need
a reminder of 19th century values there is a lengthy PDF available
here from Naturopa “The Representation of Nature in Art”:
Two short quotations
give us a sense of the document:
There is perhaps just one common feature, and this
is the need felt in every age for reference to and sustained dialogue with
nature….
Primitive man made use of the natural elements;
Baroque artists perceived a harmonious ideal in nature…whereas the Romantics
passionately yearned to capture a nature that eluded their grasp.
The role of
futurism in the promotion of industrial sounds has been well documented, here
is another link http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2009/futurism
which outlines its early history, and
again a single quotation will suffice to offer a flavour of the document.
F. T. Marinetti. “Manifeste du futurisme” [Manifesto
of Futurism]. February
20, 1909One of the most well-known and representative declarations of this manifesto, first published on February 20, 1909, in the Paris newspaper Le Figaro, is a cornerstone of Futurist thought: “We affirm that the world’s magnificence has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed.”
The inclusion of noise in music was in its infancy but the introduction of machines into the concert hall was underway (e.g. Satie and his typewriters). Included in the concept of machine sounds are those instruments which generate sounds by electrical means and the 1920’s saw the introduction of several electronic instruments of which the theremin and ondes martenot are still familiar to us today. We may be familiar with the ondes martenot in the TurangalĂ®la symphony but may less aware of its later use in popular music, e.g. Radiohead have used the ondes martenot on the Kid A album, (the title track has a wonderful array of electronic manipulations and deserves study). For those composers who use Kontakt software there is a fully sampled version of the ondes martenot, http://www.soniccouture.com/en/products/24-vintage/g27-ondes/
and for less wealthy readers it is possible to use FM sounds to recreate some of its timbres (I have used FM8 for this purpose).
Popular musicians
have always been willing to explore such unconventional instruments as often
one novel sound will provide the ear-candy that makes their music stand out
from the rest. As an example of this consider
the use of the mellotron from the 1960’s by such groups as King Crimson. The mellotron used audio tape which had a pre
recorded sound pressed against a playback head such as found in a tape
recorder. Anybody who has worked with audio tape will be aware of the
difficulties that performance areas produce (heat, portability and at that time
smoke) and it is remarkable that performers persisted and worked around these hitches.
Though tape was a difficult
medium to manipulate (splicing etc.) it held the possibility of examining sounds
in detail; composers could isolate particular moments of interest. It may be
argued that this was possible since the first primitive cylinder recordings,
but it is with tape that the period of experimentation comes to fruition.
The pioneering
years in Europe were the 1950’s and one of the great masterpieces of taped
sound Stockhausen’s “Gesang der Junglinge” came from the work done in Cologne. Such is the vision of this work that it
remains fresh despite the huge number of technical advancements made in sound
production, (many composers of the period recognised that limitations with
electronic music resulted in banal outcomes, readers can judge for themselves
the truth of this statement).
The main centres of
work were Cologne, Paris and Milan, in the UK we had the BBC radiophonic workshop,
which played a significant part in bringing new sonorities to the general
public.
The Workshop was set up to
satisfy the growing demand in the late 1950s for "radiophonic" sounds
from a group of producers and studio managers at the BBC, including Desmond Briscoe and Daphne
Oram. For some time there had been much interest in
producing innovative music and sounds to go with the pioneering programming of
the era, in particular the dramatic output of the BBC Third Programme. Often the sounds required for the atmosphere that
programme makers wished to create were unavailable or non-existent through
traditional sources and so some, such as the musically trained Oram, would look
to new techniques to produce effects and music for their pieces. Much of this
interest drew them to musique
concrète and tape manipulation techniques, since using these
methods could allow them to create soundscapes suitable for the growing range
of unconventional programming.
As stated above
tape offered the opportunity to isolate a moment of sound and Berio and Maderna
used this technique with recorded speech. This was regularly achieved by
deconstructing a recorded text into a series of phonemes. Examples include
Berio’s Thema: Omaggio a Joyce (1958) and Visage,
composed in 1961. The techniques used by
Berio included filtering, fragmenting, and multi-tracking Cathy Berberian’s voice. If the phrase “deconstructing a recorded text into a
series of phonemes” suggests a dry scholastic approach the results in Visage
are far from academic.
When I was composing “Visage” what attracted me was….a way to expand the
chances of bringing nearer musical and acoustic processes. This is why the experience of electronic music
is so important: it enables the composer
to assimilate into the musical process a vast area of sound phenomena that do
not fit pre-established codes.
Towards the end of the 1950’s a new trend
emerged in electronic music, the combination of electronic sounds with live
performance, moving the focus to the USA Milton Babbitt’s “Vision and Prayer for
soprano and synthesized tape” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3UoYBe30-M
was written in 1961 and it is a valuable experience to
follow this with the later “Reflections” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d01fwczBHp0
.
It has
been said that Babbitt was less interested in producing new timbres than in
utilising synthesisers for their rhythmic precision unobtainable through live
performance.
During the
1960’s the use of electronic sounds in popular composition became extensive,
this interest was generated in the first place by the popularity of the
electric guitar which had access to altering bass and treble, reverb, echo, delay,
tremolo, wah-wah pedal, phasing and flanging. All of these were eventually used
on the voice and then extended to acoustic instruments. Once again Stockhausen
is at the forefront his Mikrophonie II written in 1965 uses four ring
modulators to alter the source material (a choir).
Gradually the reduction in the size
of synthesizers made concert performances possible, though recordings of
synthesized sounds were also used. By the 1980s synthesizers had became
commercially available and the next stage was the development of software which
in turn brought about the growth of music produced in home studios.
When we switch on our computers today
to prepare our next composition it is worth considering the evolution of the
sounds that we use. In some cases we
fall back on sampled instruments without any further manipulation or use a
small range of pre-programmed effects, it depends very much on our purpose and
the speed at which we want a result.
There are some who enjoy the challenge of pioneering, and despite the
fact that the 50’s is long in the past some of the concerns are still valid to
explore today.
The innovation is not comfortable in an artistic endevaour, reaction to new is not always aesthetically based and one can argue that audiences do not like to be challenged, Comfortably old fashioned does not require any work on the part of the listener. But, where would we be without the very late works of Beethoven? Wagner and Mahler? Ives? Bridge? Schoenberg and 2nd Viennese school? Debussy, Stravinski? Les Six? and countless others I did not mention before we even get close to the modern era?
ReplyDeleteThis argument probably extended to the lost beginings of musical instruments It would not be hard to imagine the development of say violin from a single string col legno bowed instrument to what it is now. I would surmise that there were objections to the invention of the bow, as thhere were objections to the introduction of valves to brass, I would not be able to prove this, but I would be able to project back in history the "objections" to new sounds over the past 200 years or so. It is important to interpret this article in that continuum, Without the Cristofori escape mechanism Das Hammerklavier would have been impossible, The brass would have limited chromatic capabilities, composers would be wasting a lot of time to shape the music to get around instrumental limitations in the best sounding range of the instruments. I cannot think of a single instance in which the musical world diminished by the introduction of new sounds, but i don't even have to think hard to cite works we now cherish as a result of new sounds introduced. In my trumpet playing days a friend was bemoaning the loss of the art of clarino in trumpet playing, my response "Use a D or Eb trumpet, in any case either would sound better in that range" ,,, Yes with a little properation you can switch from Bflat to a piccolo trumpet in 1-2 secs and you have to think very hard to come up with playable passages that this switch can not be accomodated. I would venture to claim that the practicing composers who reject instrumental or sound innovations do that at their own peril. So next time you sit down at your favourite "composing spot" be that as it might a work station or piano or desk or train station, think hard about the last paragraph of the article.
Your historic accounts are always a joy to read. I have been considering my next blog and would like to comment on how we have treated the synthesiser (I don't enjoy putting a z in the spelling). Anything that speaks of infinite possibilities worries me straight away. I would like to provide a balanced viewpoint on what possibilities it opened up for composers, and if it has a role to play today in pushing the boundaries of composition.
ReplyDeleteThanks for a full reply. Ken